Breaking down the gov’s announcement; What does this actually mean for Victoria’s forests?


It’s been an emotional few days following the Victorian government announcement that logging native forests will end in 2030. The government has also committed to state-wide protections for 90,000ha of old growth forests, and 96,000ha of new protected areas, 48,500 of which are in East Gippsland. An action statement for the threatened Greater Glider was also finally released, after two years of inaction following it’s up-listing to threatened in 2017.



This announcement has been a long time coming, and this would not have happened without the dedicated and tireless campaigning of environmental groups and supporters across Victoria. GECO has congratulated Minister D’Ambrosio and Premier Andrews for making these commitments and for finally breaking their paralysis on the issue and showing leadership. But there are still a lot of details missing and these must be publicly released to reassure Victorians that the government’s commitments will actually provide what they say they will and deliver meaningful and lasting protections for threatened wildlife and ecosystems.

The government must also clearly articulate a plan for how forests will be protected into the long term, and move quickly to legislate formal protection in new national parks or secure conservation reserves. Another ten years of logging, and five more years before the industry begins scaling down, will not put a stop to Victoria’s biodiversity and extinction crisis.

So, let’s break it all down.


The Immediate Protection Areas in East Gippsland (about 45,000 hectares)

Significant stands of forest in the Goongerah catchment have been earmarked for protection in 'Immediate Protection Areas' (IPA) These forests are adjacent to the snowy river national park and include important habitat for the Endangered Large Brown Tree Frog, Long footed Potoroo, Yellow Bellied Glider and old growth forest.   

Old growth forest in the Goongerah catchment, included in the Immediate Protection Area

The entire area of the Kuark forest has also been protected. Some of Kuark was already protected by Minister D'Ambrosio in March 2018, the new protected area announcement expands protection for the Kuark forest in a significant way and extends protection to forest located south of the current southern boundary of Errinundra National Park.

The Bemm River Rainforest site of significance is now flagged for better protection and inclusion in the IPA. Approximately 400 hectares of forest was earmarked for clear felling in the rainforest site, these areas should now be protected from logging which will help to preserve the integrity and catchment health of the Lower Bemm River.

While these proposed new protections are welcomed, more of East Gippsland’s forests must be included or destructive logging in high environmental value forests will continue. Forests near  Bendoc and on the Errinundra plateau with some of the most significant populations of Great Gliders in Victoria  are still under direct threat of logging. 

The final boundaries of the IPAs are still being formalised and we are in discussion with government over the inclusion of additional important forests. 

Ancient forest in Kuark that is now protected


Old Growth

Premier Andrews and Minister D’Ambrosio have announced an immediate end to old growth logging, committing to immediately protect 90,000ha of mapped old growth forest that is outside of existing parks and reserves. But what does this actually mean? A map of the modelled old growth has been released but it’s very hard to read, and spatial data is being made available early next week.

Based on what the government has communicated to us and their announcements, 90,000 hectares of forest that is currently mapped as 'old growth forest' and that is outside of existing parks and reserves, will be excluded from logging. VicForests will have to work around the old growth areas and not log them. This is a good move, but will it protect all old growth forest from logging? Unfortunately not.

Old growth forest will not be 'protected' but there will be a ban on logging mapped old growth forest. In theory, this should make logging unviable in several areas that VicForests has earmarked for logging this summer. We are seeking a clear commitment from the government that VicForests will not be logging in areas with mapped old growth forest this summer, as they have planned to.  

Old growth forests also exist outside the old growth mapping areas, i.e they are not defined as old growth by the mapping. These forests are unprotected and earmarked for logging. Old growth forest at Granite Mountain in East Gippsland is not mapped as old growth but is being logged right now. This untouched forest has never been logged and contains trees hundreds of years in age, but sadly the old growth protection plan will fail to prevent the destruction of this forest.


Old Growth forest in Granite Mountain currently being logged


We hold grave concerns that VicForests will be using a dodgy field identification tool to self identify what they determine to be old growth in areas that are not mapped as old growth. This tool will declassify old growth in the field. Putting VicForests in charge of self identifying old growth forests and volunteering them for protection is like putting Dracula in charge of the blood bank.

Minister D’Ambrosio must ensure the most rigorous regulatory oversight is put in place to identify and protect old growth forest that occurs outside of mapped old growth areas and make sure VicForests is not put in control. The Environment Department is currently developing their own field detection method, and if its anything like VicForests’ method, old growth forests will not be safe from logging.

GECO has campaigned for old growth forest protections for decades, and the government has finally showed leadership and declared widespread protections for all mapped old forests thanks to our hard work and campaigning. Much more work needs to be done to hold them accountable to this announcement, and campaign for further protections for areas of old growth that are still being logged right now.

We need to ensure any field verification successfully identifies old growth, and does not declassify and raise the bar to unattainable standards so old growth logging can continue under deceitful and misleading definitions.  


Greater Glider Action Statement

We are alarmed by the proposed strategy for Greater Glider protection. Currently in East Gippsland, Greater Gliders receive a 100 ha Special Protection Zone when more than ten are found over 1 km. GECO citizen scientist have used this prescription to save important glider hot-spots from logging.

This long-awaited action plan falls short in providing protections for Greater Gliders. The protections are now replaced by a new prescription which says that if five Greater Gliders are found in a km, VicForests can log just less than half of the trees. This is based on the research of only one scientific paper that did not record statistically significant results. There is little evidence that it will actually be effective in ensuring they survive. Compliance to this also relies on enforcement by the Environment Department, who have been heavily criticised for their weak approach to regulation and their lack of capability to hold VicForests accountable to environment laws.

Laws must actually function to protect the glider, not continue to allow logging in key areas of habitat where Greater Gliders are found. The protections in the governments plan are based on landscape protections that fail to protect the most important hot spot areas for Greater Gliders and will allow logging in areas where these animals are found.

Forests on the Errinundra plateau and near Bendoc in far East Gippsland are well know Greater Glider hot-spots where healthy populations are surviving. These are high altitude areas at about 900-1000 meters above sea level. Greater Gliders are usually found in higher numbers at higher elevations. But the government’s action plan fails to protect any of these forests and instead has placed protection areas over lower lying areas of forest where large populations of Greater Gliders are rarely encountered. The thriving populations in the high elevation areas will continue to be logged with even less protection than what was afforded to them prior to the so-called ‘action plan’.

The Greater Glider action statement has protected significant Greater Glider populations in the Strathbogie ranges in north east Victoria and this is a great move. However, this is an isolated population in a heavily cleared landscape and its protection will not guarantee the species survival across its range in eastern Victoria. We know that Greater Gliders have declined by 55% in the last 20 years in East Gippsland and up to 80% in the Central Highlands, yet the highest value habitat areas for them will continue to be logged under the government plan.


Critical Greater Glider habitat on the Errinundra plateau


The 2030 announcement

Ten years is a long time for business to continue as usual. The wood supply contract with Australian Paper is responsible for the continued destruction of Victoria’s forests, and this contract will continue until the trees run out, and the industry collapses. This could happen well before 2030.

Government legislation (Wood pulp Agreement Act) locks in supply of native forest logs to the pulp and paper mill until 2030. This supply contract will not change under the plan and the commitment to end native forest logging in 2030 will coincide with the end of this legislated contract, basically that means logging will continue to feed the paper mill until the wood runs out. In order to meaningfully deliver the scale of protection that our forests and wildlife need to thrive, the wood volumes to the paper mill need to be reduced.

Other contracts will start having their supplies reduced by 2024, but money will not be available to logging contractors and millers who may want to exit the industry until 2024. Money should be available for workers to exit the industry now; they shouldn’t be stuck in a dying industry for another five years without the choice to abandon ship.

The government knows that the industry is collapsing. Acknowledging the end and walking away at the point of collapse is not a solution. If they were serious about providing state-wide protections for forests, they would start the transition now, and cut their ties with Australian Paper. High conservation value forests will continue to be logged for paper for another decade if they don’t.  

We have a lot of work to do. We are relieved that the government is finally acknowledging the importance of protecting forests and that the end of the native logging industry as we know it now is inevitable. This must result in greater conservation outcomes and to protect what remains of the forest. Whilst we welcome the protection of some forests and some greater protection for old growth forests a lot more needs to be done and we will continue to hold the government accountable, especially with regard to the protection of old forests in East Gippsland, which are still being logged.

We will be working hard to get more details and clarity, and will continue to hold the government to their commitments. Forests and wildlife that are still under threat are running out of time and we will need to continue our advocacy to deliver outcomes that result in meaningful and lasting protection for our forests. The fight is far from over.

Help us continue our critical citizen science and forest monitoring work advocacy and campaigning by making a tax deductible donation to support our work.

We live and work on the lands of the Gunaikurnai and Bidewell and Monero people. We acknowledge the thousands of years of their ongoing custodianship of the land and pay respect to elders past and present.

Showing 2 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Rotas Quare
    commented 2019-11-11 13:39:55 +1100
    With no immediate withdrawal of support for loggers until after the next election, and a crumb thrown to the conservationists to keep the pressure off til then, the Andrews government is really having a bob each way.

    They know what they have to do, but does anyone else find comments like this from d’Ambrosio terrifying?
    “We’re investing more than ever before to support Zoos Victoria’s tireless work to protect our native wildlife and plants for generations to come“
  • Juss Defiance
    commented 2019-11-10 01:42:02 +1100
    “Good-ish” news.
    I say too that;
    1, any increase of radiata pine timber plantations for the huge housing and construction industries must be stopped, as radiata is classified as a noxious weed, I pretty sure, so would be illegal to propagate.
    Even though we are surrounded by the same pine plantations, and, new seedlings are being planted, still.

    But, 2, stopping the foresting of old growth native forests is essential, we agree.

    But, for people to make any useful difference to the “climate” failures deforestation has been helping along, (for millennia), from now, we must totally review not only current forested areas, but the whole continent.

    Because huge tracts of farmland now, used also to be forests, and those cleared native forests were crucial to the planet’s timeless eco-balances, etc.

    The studies, science and evidence of how deforestation (plus all other assaults) that covers known “recent” human activities, and while the studies can tell us what prevailed thousands of years before, we rarely see them stating just how much of such as the Aussie continent would need to be reforested to reverse or slow the drying of the nation.

    I’m trying to say that old growth preservation is great, but we must push all authorities very hard to accept that Australians must totally rethink farming, as per the deadly denuding that has gone on here since the invasion.

    Such that all farms today have, I say, to be put to a test of the methods farmers use, the produce they profit from, it’s viability in light of the climate science, and so it’s tenability, or not.

    If “we” are serious, then lots of “trud-itional” farming has to go, and or be totally banned, revised and or redesigned in how the land is used, and not abused.

    To that, a “Utopian” review would plan so that all cleared lands have (my bushman’s estimation) at least one fifth of the denuded land given over for complete, “full-biota” reforestation.

    That, from my decades of “monitoring” these issues, is the extent to which we must unite and work to have any actual and beneficial effect on “the climate”, etc.

    But I also do not see why an intelligent body of horticulturalists can’t plan and plant new “full-biota” native forests with food crops entwined.

    Food farms have also to be started in urban areas, by doing farming completely not dependent upon flat wide open tracts of unpopulated land.

    We have to learn how to concentrate food production areas,. as much in the “vertical gardens” scenarios happening, as well as in multi-storey warehouses (“farmhouses”?).

    However, a proper analysis, would find that most of today’s food supplies are completely oriented around the for-profit corporations, which often made it illegal to grow food at home, etc. And why we too often do not now.

    (Same as our addiction to our motor cars, because the big oil and big auto bought-off politics to shut down public transport.)

    Beneath all modern farming, are the for-profit on-seller supermarkets and such, which too often determine how food is produced. All of that, is purely to suit their profit-taking bottomlines, etc. Nothing to do with feeding the masses.

    So little of how we grow food is really near enough to being “scientific”, or mathematically-economic, in terms of the relationships between output and the real estate needed, etc.

    Addressing the global climate crises, means a very different farming system and way of life for all involved.

    But it would both work for the local and global environment, and for those “farmers” who need make a profit for themselves while remaining “on the land”.

    This, generally, applies from now on, worldwide, of course.

    Sorry. Withdrawal symptoms from no home, shed or motorbike!

Donate Shop